Resume of a publication by the National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (NCCEH)
‘’Can CO2 sensors be used to assess COVID-19 transmission risk?’’.

https://ncceh.ca/content/blog/can-co2-sensors-be-used-assess-covid-19-transmission-risk

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) is monitored to assess air quality and adequate ventilation indoors
    • Human activity indoors increase levels of CO2
    • CO2 measures are also used as an indicator for hard-to-detect volatile organic compounds (VOC) and microorganisms
    • Ventilation settings are then calculated accordingly to prevent CO2 buildup, and also reduce exposures to potentially harmful compounds and pathogens

 

  • Indoors CO2 acceptable standards has been arbitrarily established at around 1000 ppm
    • Nonetheless, recent reviews have failed to demonstrate a clear link between increasing CO2 concentration and lower reported quality of air and associated symptoms1
    • Furthermore, a study has shown that CO2 linked to human activity had effects on perceived air quality and cognitive impairment, but that pure CO2 at the same concentration did not have these effects, suggesting that something else related to human activity (breathing, talking) was responsible for the symptoms reported2

 

  • Thus, CO2 measures might not be an adequate indicator of airborne biological contaminants, such as bacteria and viruses:
    • Historically, many studies have demonstrated a link between adequate ventilation (as per CO2 levels) and lower transmission of airborne diseases.
    • Yet, multiple factors can affect CO2 emissions and have little to no effect on increasing airborne microbial count.
      • Animals and other living beings
      • Combustion devices
    • Also, some factors can increase or decrease the airborne charge of biological contaminants, but have no effect on CO2 emissions
      • Superspreaders; People that emit high charges of airborne pathogens, but don’t produce more CO2
      • Singing and talking has been linked to an increase in emission of viral particles
      • Wearing a mask reduces the emission of airborne bio-contaminants, but has no effects on CO2 production
      • Air disinfection and filtration have no effect on CO2 levels but reduce airborne particle charge

 

In summary, even though CO2 measures and monitoring can be installed at low cost and used to evaluate ventilation, it might not be an adequate measure of the risk of exposure to airborne pathogens (such as SARS-CoV-2). It does, however, helps to educate the public about the importance of improving ventilation and indoor air quality (IAQ).

1 https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/ashrae_journal_-_september_2019_76_-_77.pdf
2 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ina.12284

No comment yet, add your voice below!


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *